<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veronica Belmont accused by Scoble of paying Twitter for their recommendation!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: twitter suggested user winer scoble laporte &#124; The Tech News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>twitter suggested user winer scoble laporte &#124; The Tech News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>[...] annoyed by the way people were given these highly financially valuable followers that he asked if techcrunch had paid Twitter $10,000 for a place on the list. He also accused Veronica Belmont of paying for her place on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] annoyed by the way people were given these highly financially valuable followers that he asked if techcrunch had paid Twitter $10,000 for a place on the list. He also accused Veronica Belmont of paying for her place on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devolute</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>devolute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>Whole thing very depressing.

I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll both get loads more followers out of it tho, so doubles all round! hurrah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whole thing very depressing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll both get loads more followers out of it tho, so doubles all round! hurrah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whogivesashit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>whogivesashit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>you twits need to get a fricken life.
you can tell scobledoo doesnt have one.
what a complete waste of space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you twits need to get a fricken life.<br />
you can tell scobledoo doesnt have one.<br />
what a complete waste of space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley Dewar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley Dewar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>When I signed up to Twitter, my bio simply read &quot;Not all smart poppies are tall poppies. Capiche?&quot; - a tongue in cheek reference to my blogs at wordpress.

As time went by and I either followed suggested people or deleted them from the list, I found that those who were left had the word &quot;tall&quot;, &quot;smart&quot; or &quot;poppy/poppies&quot; in their bio. None of them particularly interesting, either and all with very few followers; few tweets and just not active.

Changed my bio and suddenly got a whole load of much more interesting, higher ranked people to look at and follow if I wished - so, obviously there is some comparisions made within the suggested people&#039;s bios to look for a degree of compatability.

I don&#039;t suggest this is the total answer - but it certainly made a huge difference to those twitter members actually offered as suggested followers.

Just something to consider.  I don&#039;t have a huge following - less than 500 - but my Tweeter Grading is in the higher 90&#039;s.

Lesley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I signed up to Twitter, my bio simply read &#8220;Not all smart poppies are tall poppies. Capiche?&#8221; &#8211; a tongue in cheek reference to my blogs at wordpress.</p>
<p>As time went by and I either followed suggested people or deleted them from the list, I found that those who were left had the word &#8220;tall&#8221;, &#8220;smart&#8221; or &#8220;poppy/poppies&#8221; in their bio. None of them particularly interesting, either and all with very few followers; few tweets and just not active.</p>
<p>Changed my bio and suddenly got a whole load of much more interesting, higher ranked people to look at and follow if I wished &#8211; so, obviously there is some comparisions made within the suggested people&#8217;s bios to look for a degree of compatability.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t suggest this is the total answer &#8211; but it certainly made a huge difference to those twitter members actually offered as suggested followers.</p>
<p>Just something to consider.  I don&#8217;t have a huge following &#8211; less than 500 &#8211; but my Tweeter Grading is in the higher 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Lesley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News Blog Editor &#124; Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor &#124; Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>Mouse,

Thanks for the comment. The good point I referred to, was that Twitter&#039;s Biz Stone admitted to giving these places to his staff&#039;s favourites. NOT that Robert was right to accuse anyone (he said in these comments he didn&#039;t, but he did!)  I agree with you that the proof needs to be put up by Robert. How can anyone claim they didn&#039;t do anything?  Robert - I&#039;m pretty sure you went nutz that evening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mouse,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. The good point I referred to, was that Twitter&#8217;s Biz Stone admitted to giving these places to his staff&#8217;s favourites. NOT that Robert was right to accuse anyone (he said in these comments he didn&#8217;t, but he did!)  I agree with you that the proof needs to be put up by Robert. How can anyone claim they didn&#8217;t do anything?  Robert &#8211; I&#8217;m pretty sure you went nutz that evening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>No actually, Robert doesn&#039;t make a good point.  The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.  Scoble at his pompous worst indeed.  Seems more likely that they rotate popular users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No actually, Robert doesn&#8217;t make a good point.  The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.  Scoble at his pompous worst indeed.  Seems more likely that they rotate popular users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SparkyInCorona</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>SparkyInCorona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Scoble is mostly off-base on this. Is something strange and unanswered going on with Twitter? Undoubtedly!

But demanding that Veronica prove that she did NOT pay Twitter is pure bait. It&#039;s the old &quot;When did you stop beating your wife?&quot; Question. How the hell is she supposed to prove a negative like that? Give Scoble all of her personal financial information? Why not demand that she hand over all user names and passwords.

This is Scoble at his pompous worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scoble is mostly off-base on this. Is something strange and unanswered going on with Twitter? Undoubtedly!</p>
<p>But demanding that Veronica prove that she did NOT pay Twitter is pure bait. It&#8217;s the old &#8220;When did you stop beating your wife?&#8221; Question. How the hell is she supposed to prove a negative like that? Give Scoble all of her personal financial information? Why not demand that she hand over all user names and passwords.</p>
<p>This is Scoble at his pompous worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter&#8217;s list leads to nerd fight. &#124; Neil Gorman's: Text Edit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter&#8217;s list leads to nerd fight. &#124; Neil Gorman's: Text Edit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>[...] clicked the link to see what this was all about. I sat and read the post, then I read it again. The part that really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clicked the link to see what this was all about. I sat and read the post, then I read it again. The part that really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News Blog Editor &#124; Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor &#124; Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Veronica,

Hey, thanks for stopping by the blog.  The story only REALLY became a story when you got involved. No one&#039;s suggested here or elsewhere, that you or any of the other people on the list did anything wrong. The way the list has been based on buddies of the Twitter team is what&#039;s pissed a lot of people off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veronica,</p>
<p>Hey, thanks for stopping by the blog.  The story only REALLY became a story when you got involved. No one&#8217;s suggested here or elsewhere, that you or any of the other people on the list did anything wrong. The way the list has been based on buddies of the Twitter team is what&#8217;s pissed a lot of people off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/22/veronica-belmont-accused-by-scoble-of-paying-twitter-for-their-recommendation/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1623#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>Two issues here:
   1. the &quot;tempest in a teacup&quot; between Scoble and Veronica
   2. the &quot;real&quot; issue of suggested follows

I looked at that list. Some, I understood (the NY Times, @iJustine). Others I didn&#039;t (JetBlue? who cares other than customers?  @AFineFrenzy? No bio, follows only 2, few updates).

I agree with Jim Connolly above (comment #19). There’s an obvious flaw in how Twitter allocates these so-called ’staff picks’.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two issues here:<br />
   1. the &#8220;tempest in a teacup&#8221; between Scoble and Veronica<br />
   2. the &#8220;real&#8221; issue of suggested follows</p>
<p>I looked at that list. Some, I understood (the NY Times, @iJustine). Others I didn&#8217;t (JetBlue? who cares other than customers?  @AFineFrenzy? No bio, follows only 2, few updates).</p>
<p>I agree with Jim Connolly above (comment #19). There’s an obvious flaw in how Twitter allocates these so-called ’staff picks’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
