<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter to charge companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-charge-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-charge-companies/</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Would advertising kill twitter? If not done properly, absolutely. - The Chitika Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-charge-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-6841</link>
		<dc:creator>Would advertising kill twitter? If not done properly, absolutely. - The Chitika Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1543#comment-6841</guid>
		<description>[...] idea of having businesses pay to use Twitter has been bandied about before. This, in my opinion, is the best possible way of bringing pay-to-play to the Twittersphere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea of having businesses pay to use Twitter has been bandied about before. This, in my opinion, is the best possible way of bringing pay-to-play to the Twittersphere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Millington</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-charge-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>George Millington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1543#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>Sure, happy to help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, happy to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-charge-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1543#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Hi George,

Thanks for the comment.

It seems that the post on http://blog.twitter.com confirms that they are about to introduce charging for additional features, as reported here and elsewhere this week.

I&#039;m guessing that they have released this statement, to reassure people that the &#039;regular&#039; twitter features will remain free.  This was always going to be the case - to charge people for the current service would see them lose the massive majority of their users.

The value to businesses of better tech support (any tech support would be an improvement) and the ability to work more effectively with lists etc is something businesses have been crying out for, for ages - and something they will pay for.

Thanks again Geo2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi George,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>It seems that the post on <a href="http://blog.twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.twitter.com</a> confirms that they are about to introduce charging for additional features, as reported here and elsewhere this week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that they have released this statement, to reassure people that the &#8216;regular&#8217; twitter features will remain free.  This was always going to be the case &#8211; to charge people for the current service would see them lose the massive majority of their users.</p>
<p>The value to businesses of better tech support (any tech support would be an improvement) and the ability to work more effectively with lists etc is something businesses have been crying out for, for ages &#8211; and something they will pay for.</p>
<p>Thanks again Geo2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Millington</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-charge-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>George Millington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1543#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim, 
You might want to check out the Twitter blog (http://blog.twitter.com/)  for an update on this issue.  They write:  

&quot;...it&#039;s important to note that whatever we come up with, Twitter will remain free to use by everyone—individuals, companies, celebrities, etc. What we&#039;re thinking about is adding value in places where we are already seeing traction, not imposing fees on existing services.&quot;

Don&#039;t know if this is backtracking or the real story, but thought you&#039;d like to see the &quot;official position&quot;.

Best,
Geo2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,<br />
You might want to check out the Twitter blog (<a href="http://blog.twitter.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.twitter.com/</a>)  for an update on this issue.  They write:  </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;it&#8217;s important to note that whatever we come up with, Twitter will remain free to use by everyone—individuals, companies, celebrities, etc. What we&#8217;re thinking about is adding value in places where we are already seeing traction, not imposing fees on existing services.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if this is backtracking or the real story, but thought you&#8217;d like to see the &#8220;official position&#8221;.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Geo2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
