<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Revision3 &#8211; Now TWiT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter networking followers micro blogging &#124; The Tech News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter networking followers micro blogging &#124; The Tech News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>[...] you and I know, but the average man or woman on the street would never have heard of!  Kevin Rose, Leo Laporte, Veronica Belmont and Scoble [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you and I know, but the average man or woman on the street would never have heard of!  Kevin Rose, Leo Laporte, Veronica Belmont and Scoble [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-922</guid>
		<description>More and more it&#039;s getting off topic in the netcasts. It&#039;s hard to find the time to devote to 1:30 ramble fests.

Net@Night stays on but i think that&#039;s because of Amber Maccarthur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more it&#8217;s getting off topic in the netcasts. It&#8217;s hard to find the time to devote to 1:30 ramble fests.</p>
<p>Net@Night stays on but i think that&#8217;s because of Amber Maccarthur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Pantall</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pantall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-729</guid>
		<description>I download my TWiT podcasts and listen to them at the gym. I listen to FLOSS Weekly, Security Now, Net@Night and TWiT.

I think podcast creators like Leo Laporte and Revision3 need to keep a wary eye toward their advertising dollars, but I don&#039;t think they&#039;re going away any time soon. If they do go away, I&#039;ll cry.

When it comes to mentioning sponsors: The cool thing about Leo is that he incorprorates them into his shows. He doesn&#039;t just use a pre-recorded spot every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I download my TWiT podcasts and listen to them at the gym. I listen to FLOSS Weekly, Security Now, Net@Night and TWiT.</p>
<p>I think podcast creators like Leo Laporte and Revision3 need to keep a wary eye toward their advertising dollars, but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re going away any time soon. If they do go away, I&#8217;ll cry.</p>
<p>When it comes to mentioning sponsors: The cool thing about Leo is that he incorprorates them into his shows. He doesn&#8217;t just use a pre-recorded spot every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Brian,

An excellent comment - thanks.  
&lt;strong&gt;
Which TWiT podcasts do you guys listen to?&lt;/strong&gt;
I listen to TwiT, Windows weekly, Mac Break and occasionally Security now.

Would appreciate your feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>An excellent comment &#8211; thanks.<br />
<strong><br />
Which TWiT podcasts do you guys listen to?</strong><br />
I listen to TwiT, Windows weekly, Mac Break and occasionally Security now.</p>
<p>Would appreciate your feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-695</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t blame Leo for all the sponsorship messages - after all it is his for-profit business. A guy&#039;s gotta eat and support his family first.  

Those listeners who accuse Leo of &quot;jumping shark&quot; just don&#039;t get it. I&#039;m with Samuel Chaboya that &quot;the content&quot; is just chit chat. This is a sure sign that Leo is spreading himself way too thin, his productions are lacking quality content and he is too comfortable with the numbers to think people will listen anyway- regardless of all the ads. The old way of having a guest, turn on the mic without a plan technique and toss in some ads is the radio version of a talking head on television - BORING.

&quot;Jumping Monkeys&quot; and &quot;Munchcast&quot; podcasts? he may be getting paid to produce these but it is a complete waist of his time and not worth it in the long run. Leo should cut the fat and give his audience something to chew on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t blame Leo for all the sponsorship messages &#8211; after all it is his for-profit business. A guy&#8217;s gotta eat and support his family first.  </p>
<p>Those listeners who accuse Leo of &#8220;jumping shark&#8221; just don&#8217;t get it. I&#8217;m with Samuel Chaboya that &#8220;the content&#8221; is just chit chat. This is a sure sign that Leo is spreading himself way too thin, his productions are lacking quality content and he is too comfortable with the numbers to think people will listen anyway- regardless of all the ads. The old way of having a guest, turn on the mic without a plan technique and toss in some ads is the radio version of a talking head on television &#8211; BORING.</p>
<p>&#8220;Jumping Monkeys&#8221; and &#8220;Munchcast&#8221; podcasts? he may be getting paid to produce these but it is a complete waist of his time and not worth it in the long run. Leo should cut the fat and give his audience something to chew on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Wayne,

yes, I am a keen follower of Leo&#039;s work because I consider him to be the best in his field.  I think you are being a little unfair complaining about the way he mentions his sponsors, as it is their sponsorship money that funds the whole business.  No sponsors, no shows.

I agree about Calacanis&#039; constant bragging about his new car &lt;strong&gt;(Jason, you have a great car - we get it!)&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne,</p>
<p>yes, I am a keen follower of Leo&#8217;s work because I consider him to be the best in his field.  I think you are being a little unfair complaining about the way he mentions his sponsors, as it is their sponsorship money that funds the whole business.  No sponsors, no shows.</p>
<p>I agree about Calacanis&#8217; constant bragging about his new car <strong>(Jason, you have a great car &#8211; we get it!)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-688</guid>
		<description>I know this blogs a supporter of leo, but the truth is his stuffs so filled with sponsor messages that its painful to listen to. I gave up on the twit stuff last year.  Leos great but those ads are killing his content. Also got bored of calananis talking crap and bragging about his battery car.

Nice blog jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this blogs a supporter of leo, but the truth is his stuffs so filled with sponsor messages that its painful to listen to. I gave up on the twit stuff last year.  Leos great but those ads are killing his content. Also got bored of calananis talking crap and bragging about his battery car.</p>
<p>Nice blog jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-686</guid>
		<description>@chris
Are you forgetting that Leo had to drop some of his twit podcasts recently because of the poor listener numbers?

@Mike
I checked with what the post said and they are right, it does show twit.tv numbers down over the last quarter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris<br />
Are you forgetting that Leo had to drop some of his twit podcasts recently because of the poor listener numbers?</p>
<p>@Mike<br />
I checked with what the post said and they are right, it does show twit.tv numbers down over the last quarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>John-Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-684</guid>
		<description>Leo Laporte is a busy guy.  He has to produce hours worth of video or audio content every day.  So, why would he be turning up on so many other shows right now?

The only reason he was on all them shows this past week, was to try and get some listeners for his own shows.  Oldest trick in the book is to turn up on other podcasts, when your own are not doing well, to get some new listeners.

Is that why he went to his longtime friends Scoble and the Buzz guys in the same week? 

Am I the only one whos noticed that Leo&#039;s shows are devoting more and more time to sponsor messages?  Its like he&#039;s desperate to sell something for them; maybe because hes worried they will leave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo Laporte is a busy guy.  He has to produce hours worth of video or audio content every day.  So, why would he be turning up on so many other shows right now?</p>
<p>The only reason he was on all them shows this past week, was to try and get some listeners for his own shows.  Oldest trick in the book is to turn up on other podcasts, when your own are not doing well, to get some new listeners.</p>
<p>Is that why he went to his longtime friends Scoble and the Buzz guys in the same week? </p>
<p>Am I the only one whos noticed that Leo&#8217;s shows are devoting more and more time to sponsor messages?  Its like he&#8217;s desperate to sell something for them; maybe because hes worried they will leave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/2009/01/18/first-revision3-now-twit/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1171#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for the comment.  As stated in the post, I&#039;m a fan of Leo&#039;s work and simply asked a question.  How can you call BS on someone asking a question?

I also used &lt;strong&gt;compete.com and then checked that against alexa&lt;/strong&gt; to get a rough idea of the direction of traffic to Leo&#039;s site and not just alexa, as you suggested. As I said in the post Chris, these two metrics were not totally accurate - simply useful for showing trends.

I think Leo&#039;s site numbers do matter - as his site, &lt;strong&gt;hosts the live content he produces&lt;/strong&gt;.  If the number of people viewing that content / advertising really is down, (and I hope the stats are wrong) could that impact advertisers?  

You mentioned that all sites take a dip during the holidays. I took a look at some of my other favourite podcasters and saw the exact opposite.  Take a look at Cali Lewis&#039;s numbers over the same period (or Robert Scoble&#039;s) and you will see they &lt;strong&gt;gained&lt;/strong&gt;; as did Cnet, crankygeeks, dl.tv and many other podcast providers. 

I agree 100% with you about the accuracy of third party stats providers like alexa and compete.  I was just asking the question, that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  As stated in the post, I&#8217;m a fan of Leo&#8217;s work and simply asked a question.  How can you call BS on someone asking a question?</p>
<p>I also used <strong>compete.com and then checked that against alexa</strong> to get a rough idea of the direction of traffic to Leo&#8217;s site and not just alexa, as you suggested. As I said in the post Chris, these two metrics were not totally accurate &#8211; simply useful for showing trends.</p>
<p>I think Leo&#8217;s site numbers do matter &#8211; as his site, <strong>hosts the live content he produces</strong>.  If the number of people viewing that content / advertising really is down, (and I hope the stats are wrong) could that impact advertisers?  </p>
<p>You mentioned that all sites take a dip during the holidays. I took a look at some of my other favourite podcasters and saw the exact opposite.  Take a look at Cali Lewis&#8217;s numbers over the same period (or Robert Scoble&#8217;s) and you will see they <strong>gained</strong>; as did Cnet, crankygeeks, dl.tv and many other podcast providers. </p>
<p>I agree 100% with you about the accuracy of third party stats providers like alexa and compete.  I was just asking the question, that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
